The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university.
The picture displays a pupil room for 2 people flat and a single bedroom provided from a university in Australia.
Overall, there are nearly 6 differences shown in the diagram. It is clear that there are more furniture and a living area in the room for two people.
Look at the diagram in more detail, the plan for one person costs $200 per, about $150 lower than the choice of two people. However, Plan for two people has a larger living area, with 24 square meters. These figures were nearly one time as high as the single bedroom plan.
The biggest difference can be seen at the center of 2 bedrooms, which provide a set of table and chairs, cupboard. It is interesting that television is in the kitchen for the two-person room but it locates in the living room for a one-person room. There are no significant differences when we compare the location of the bathroom and windows.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-08 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-08 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | TLan168 | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | 10diemcute | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | 10diemcute | 78 | view |
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people 63
- the chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 78
- 1234 11
- the chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 56
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 15.0 33.7804878049 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 731.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59748427673 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52002776397 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603773584906 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.0554886211 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.2222222222 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401400902001 0.215688989381 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150996186825 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134803125543 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231962192642 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457872657898 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.1 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.