The plans show a school library 5 years ago and the same library now.
The maps illustrate how a school library changed over the 5-year period.
It is clearly seen that there are major changes in studying tables and library office areas. The school library also has some new rooms in the Southwest.
Looking at the center of the room, more tables have been added for students to study privately. The bookshelves in the South as well as the desk for computers in the Northeast corner were turned into desks for students’ laptops after 5 years. In addition, the library office located in the Southeast of this map has been removed to make way for a conference room.
In the Southwest, the classroom has been demolished to build a recording studio whilst the meeting room remains unchanged. The space of the borrowing and returning desk was divided into 2 distinct rooms. While there are significant transformations in the school library, the bookshelves on the top of the room experience no change over 5 years.
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how It looks now 74
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What sort of punishment should parents and t 84
- The plants show a student common room from five years ago and now 78
- The plans show a school library 5 years ago and the same library now 84
- The diagram shows the process for labelling shellfish for the international market Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, well, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 784.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68208757314 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63125 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.997232733 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1111111111 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160536442915 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804412674801 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932727818612 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137222339915 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104121362009 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.