The process of Pu-erh Raw Tea and Ripe Tea Production.
The picture illustrates the process of Pu-erh Raw Tea and Ripe tea production.
Overall, Pu-Erh Ripe Tea production consists of five stages. Meanwhile, producing Vintage Pu-erh Raw Tea only requires four steps.
In the first stage, tea leaves are fried in a pan using a fire to eliminate enzymes. Then, the roasted tea leaves are rolled under the sun to create loose raw tea. Following that, the tea is molded to create a fermentation process, and this process produces loose Ripe Tea. After that, the tea undergoes the compression stage to produce the final product, Pu-erh ripe tea.
Moving to the production of Ripe Tea. The first two initial processes are similar to that of Pu-erh Ripe tea. Tea leaves are fried in a pan to deactivate the enzyme. In the second stage, the fried-tea leaves are rolled under the sun to produce loose raw tea. After that, Pu-erh raw tea is, then, compressed. Finally, it is stored to produce vintage Pu-erh Raw tea.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- For all children the ability to play a musical instrument is just as important as the ability to read and write To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Film stars and celebrities often share their views on public matters that have little to do with their profession Is this a positive or negative development 73
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Many people now undertake extreme activities from hang gliding to mountain climbing Why do people risk their lives in this way and do you think this is a good trend 61
- The line graph demonstrates how the percentage of British families that owned different number of cars oscillated between 1971 and 2007
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, second, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85365853659 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42710502172 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 74.0 106.607317073 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451219512195 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.9247103578 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 61.2307692308 112.824112599 54% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.6153846154 22.9334400587 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.69230769231 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.766028971265 0.215688989381 355% => The coherence between essay topic and essay body is overfitting.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.380984139053 0.103423049105 368% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150608794071 0.0843802449381 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.63054238005 0.15604864568 404% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711203136372 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 13.2329268293 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.96 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.