The proportion of money spent on various household expenses in Malaysia and Japan is shown in the pie chart
The proportion of money spent on various household expenses in Malaysia and Japan is shown in the pie chart. It is evident that the highest expenditure in Malaysia was housing while other goods and services were the highest in Japan, and the health care expense became the least in both countries.
In Malaysia, housing cost reached 34% of total expenditure which is the highest, while in Japan the housing stood at the second place with 21%, inferior to other goods and services. The money spending for food is fairly similar in both countries, approximately 25%.
Moreover, the Japanese spent more money for transportation with 20%, doubled the figure of transporting expense in Malaysia. Japan’s health care expenditure was 6% which was the least cost recorded. This contrasted to Malaysia which spent a half of Japan’s figure for their health necessity.
- The graph and table below give information about four new painkilling drugs which have recently been tested on patients. 73
- the number of viewers who enjoy sporting programs in particular countries (Australia, The UK, The USA, and Canada). 89
- People now have the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world due to the development of communication technology and transportation.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Line Graph 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 732.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 140.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22857142857 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43979062825 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79690061697 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564285714286 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6025901862 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.571428571 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395360384285 0.215688989381 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.227889044494 0.103423049105 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.31862966034 0.0843802449381 378% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278944883341 0.15604864568 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.201136047832 0.0819641961636 245% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.