Improvement in health, education, and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
The more improvement of health, education and trade, the more development of nations over the world. Some countries cannot develop their nations because of the limited quality of health, education and trade. While they are relieved with their conditions, those part of countries need to be assisted with the richer countries to support the poorer countries. I totally agree that the richer countries should take more responsibility for helping those relieved countries in those areas of development.
There are various aspects which can support poor countries to take apart from development of their nations. The high level of fitness reflects the better quality of nations. The society can do many activities such as working, making business, and studying when they are healthier. Those activities will make some improvement of the nations. In other hand, education is also crucial in the bridging to be more developed country. The better quality of education can encourage more intelligent people to invent the innovative projects as the development goals. Trading is the other crucial thing that makes the income for countries. The good trading, with more qualified health and education, will be the source of funding to develop the countries.
Those essential fields are not really implemented by the poorer countries so that they need attention from external sides such as wealthier countries. As the richer countries have more income, the allocation of profit to poorer countries will manage to the better condition of those under privilege countries. The technological advance of richer countries is the other reason. Those technologies will be beneficial to help poor countries in order to develop them since they don’t have any adequate technological assets.
In conclusion, I believe that if the richer countries support the poorer countries in health, education, and trade, the drastic development will happen. The contribution of wealthier countries means so much to the development of under privilege nations, by the potential income and the technology of rich countries
- the three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000 78
- The bar graph provides information about the most Common sports played in New Zealand in 2002. 56
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999, and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999. 78
- The bar chart provides the information of production and consumption of electricity in ten countries in 2014 73
- The chart below shows the number of films produced by five countries in three years. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...l happen. The contribution of wealthier countries means so much to the development of und...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome and the technology of rich countries
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, while, apart from, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46296296296 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84136412645 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453703703704 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0553289824 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257386775514 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926955388414 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624189329573 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167634445204 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644107356431 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.