The Proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009.
The percentage of student that entered four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009 is presented in the table graph.
Overall, Community Schools rose steadily and reached a peak in the end of the periods while the others school showed the reverse. By in the end of the period, the most unpopular school was Specialist Schools although more student intended to attend Community Schools.
By 2005, the Community Schools had shown a threefold increase to 32% while Specialist and Grammar Schools decrease steadily. A dramatic fall had shown in the Voluntary-controlled Schools to 38%.
Both figures for Specialist Schools and Grammar Schools continued to decline steadily between 2005 and 2009. The former graph decrease by 1% while the latter one fell to 12%. A sharply fall had been seen in the Voluntary-controlled Schools to almost the Grammar Schools figure in the beginning of the period.
- The different modes of transport used to travels to and from work in one European city in1960, 1980 and 2000 61
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extend do you agree or dis 67
- The Proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009. 56
- One tool to promote products is through advertising campaign. while promotion contains some merits the demerits outweigh the perceived benefits. 73
- The differences in wheat exports over three different areas between 1985 and 1990. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('sharply') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fall') instead of another adjective.
...by 1% while the latter one fell to 12%. A sharply fall had been seen in the Voluntary-controll...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 761.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 145.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24827586207 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47010008196 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00118090115 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544827586207 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5553666892 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.125 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294441765452 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13801177295 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128920302082 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209581535154 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139930875093 0.0819641961636 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.