The table illustrates the percentage of students taking part in four types of secondary schooling in the period of from 2000 to 2009.
In general, the tendency of join in community schools significantly increased higher throughout the period. Meanwhile, the drop in the other of secondary education gradually changed lower in those years.
The schools for the social community was the lowest percentage, which similar to specialist schools, gained 12%. Through nine years, public schools became the most popular trend that attracted most students, more than 50% in 2009 compared to 2000.
In contrast, Voluntary-controlled schools which was the highest percentage, reached 52%, dramatically decreased to 20% in 2009. Following to the rest, grammar schools sharply fell a half, from 24% to 12% in 2000 to 2009 respectively. Finally, the school for the special people join in had a moderate change, declined by 1% about each 5-year period from the data shown.
- Some people claim that the government should provide free health care Others think that the government will not provide the most innovative methods of treatment and it s better to invest those funds in education and culture What is your opinion 88
- The table below shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in2012 and 2013. 73
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries over a twenty year period 67
- It has been said that the world is becoming a global village in which there are no boundaries to trade and communication Do the benefits of globalization outweigh the drawbacks Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own k 61
- When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, second, so, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36184210526 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96563156307 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644736842105 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 14.4562918828 43.030603864 34% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.875 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176033153042 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774889783126 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706684596912 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120197164084 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078727084583 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.