The line graph shows the percentage of UK audience of the radio and television in noon and midnight in the whole day in UK from October to December in 1992.
Overall, the television was so popular in the noon time the people of UK watched television significantly, while the ratio of radio was quit low in the midnight.
Firstly, on 6:00 a.m. the radio audience was much higher as compared to television the percentage was around 8% then its dramatically increased and the ratio was reached approximately 28% on 8:00 a.m. after that the radio audience was speedy declined and the percentage was more than 10% on noon 2 p.m. than the ratio was slightly raised which was 14% then the radio witnessed show decreased and in midnight the percentage was 3%.
Secondly, the television was start from 0% audience then its gradually increased and in noon 12:00 p.m. the percentage of UK population was nearly 15% after the time of 2:00 p.m. ratio audience was on the peak which was so popular and much higher percentage in UK and the ratio was nearby 45% after that, it was dramatically drop and the audience percentage was about 3% in midnight on 2:00 p.m.
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 66
- The bar chart gives information about the number of car journeys into the city centre made by residents and non residents Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- the bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in different parts of the world 61
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full time or part time 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 58, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...a.m. the radio audience was much higher as compared to television the percentage w...
^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'dropped'.
Suggestion: dropped
...rby 45% after that, it was dramatically drop and the audience percentage was about 3...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71428571429 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64152427837 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.423645320197 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 50.0 22.4926829268 222% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 127.613674816 43.030603864 297% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 239.25 112.824112599 212% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 50.75 22.9334400587 221% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 13.25 5.23603664747 253% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267371579906 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.252035236789 0.103423049105 244% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.188021546838 0.0843802449381 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252035236789 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.188021546838 0.0819641961636 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.1 13.2329268293 197% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.65 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.4 10.3012195122 198% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.93 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 22.0 10.9970731707 200% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.