re write The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy since 1980 with projections until 2030 book 9 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph provides information about a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. In general, it can be seen from the graph that the trends will probably be different.

Wr can see the number of energy in petrol and oil increased sharply from almost 35 quadrillion unities in 1980 to 42 quadrillion unities in 2005 and it will grow rapidly between 44 quadrillion unities in 2010 to 50 quadrillion unities in 2030. However, the unities of energy in coal climbed gradually from 16 quadrillion in 1980 to 23 quadrillion in 2008. After the estimations it will rise slowly between 24 quadrillion in 2010 and approximately 30 quadrillion in 2030. Furthermore, natural gas unities of energy consumption fluctuated about almost 20 quadrillion unities in 1980 to nearly 25 quadrillion in 2008.

On the other hand, the unities of nuclear and solar energy was increased slowly from almost 4 quadrillion unities in 1980 to less than 10 quadrillion unities in 2008 but in 2010 it will remain unchange over the period of next 20 years. In addition, the hydropower unities of energy consumption was vary from 3 quadrillion unities in 1980 to 5 quadrillion in 2005. After the period the unities of Consumption will decrease and remain same from 2 quadrillion in 2009 to 2030.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'varied'.
Suggestion: varied
...power unities of energy consumption was vary from 3 quadrillion unities in 1980 to 5...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, in addition, in general, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93693693694 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9453122166 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45045045045 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8774497433 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.777777778 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181275065696 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11898945964 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137247152943 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190070936748 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138429942337 0.0819641961636 169% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.