Report for a university lecturer
The graph below illustrates the entertainment expense of various types from 1995 to 2000 on three main areas.
Overall, it is obviously that the money consumed for entertainment increase remarkably overtime in all regions for all forms.
There was a dramatic growth in the spent fun money in United State from 184 billion dollars to 257 billion dollars in five-year period. The amount of spending in United States was also double the figure for Europe, in either 1995 or 2000. In Asia, the spending was at least among all areas, but still experienced a double increase to 100 billion dollars in 2000.
In term of different forms of entertainment, the publishing moderately occupied the highest expense, following by the television. However, in comparison with the amount of money spent in United States and Asia, which witnessed a significant increase by 50 billion dollars, the quantity in Europe went up slightly by approximately 15 billion dollars. The expenditure of cinema, video and music were less fluctuated, which maintained the amount of about 10, 20 and 35 billion dollars respectively.
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- A report for university lectureer show how money was spent on different form of entertainment 78
- Some people think sport play an important role in society, however, others think it is just a leisure activity. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 61
- Most people try to balance between their work and other parts of their lives. Unfortunately, not many achieve this balance. What are the reasons for this and what can be done to solve this. 61
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2191011236 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89022421896 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606741573034 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9022030995 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.125 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0525127427261 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0264403883576 0.103423049105 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480840901245 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.041598744294 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554618333609 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.