The graph below shows cinema attendance by age in Great Britain. Write a report for
a university lecturer describing the information shown.
The provided line graph illustrates the data on the percentage of people who are present in the cinema from five different age groups in Great Britain over the period of 19 years, starting from 1984.
Overall, it can be observed that cinema attendance fluctuated among all groups of age throughout the period. However, there was an upward trend in cinema attendance for all groups with the 15-24 age group displaying the most significant increase from 1984 to 2003.
Examining the data for all age groups in more detail, it is evident that the 15-24 age community showed the highest rise (47%) in cinema attendance, from 18% in 1984 to approximately 65% in 2003.
The 25-35 age group exhibited the second most significant growth (28%), starting at 5% from 1984 to 33% in 2003. The remaining groups of age (7-14 age, and age of 35 and over) demonstrated 35% and 17% present in cinema in 2003, starting from 10% and 5%, respectively in 1984.
In conclusion, while all groups exhibit constant change, the 35 and over age community showed the minimum fluctuation among all groups.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-07-15 | Zahid6400 | 56 | view |
2024-07-09 | Sajib Ahamed | 84 | view |
2024-06-12 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
2024-05-14 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
2023-11-03 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
- The bar chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the last year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 67
- Some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication do benefits of this outweigh the problems 61
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively 75
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85326086957 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61845434681 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538043478261 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6997547378 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.571428571 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182734223141 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102755872578 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376420722416 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115227477966 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339813390075 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.