The roundabout will get two more exits in the future. There will be houses built around two routes, one to the northwest and the other to the north, and the road to the north will pass via a recently completed bridge to allow us to access the new housing estate, aside from just the countryside in the northeast. A minor roundabout will be constructed on the major road at the location of the big roundabout. Around the sizable roundabout, homes and amenities including shops and medical facilities will take the place of factories. On the east side, a school will be constructed along with a fresh park.
This entire production area will be transformed into a neighborhood.
The following table details police budgets from different sources while the two pie charts illustrate the amount that has been allocated to three main purposes, and calculated over two years: 2017 and 2018
In 2017, the total police budget for the area surveyed was around £300 million, a slight increase of less than £3 million the following year. Of the three sources, the national government contributed £175.5 and £177.8 million over two years respectively, a not very significant increase. Local tax revenues also increased significantly by more than £10 million to reach £102.3 million in 2018. Other sources (such as grants) accounted for the smallest share, at around £38 million in both years.
In terms of spending, the amount of salary paid to officials and employees, although reduced from 75% to 69%, still accounted for the largest proportion of all. Noting an unfavorable trend is that spending on technology, although increasing from 8% to 14%, but is still at the lowest level. Spending on buildings and transportation was flat at just 17% for two years.
Overall, the police budget in that area has been increased in two years, and money from the national government remains the main source. In terms of spending, we see that the amount of money paid to staff and employees is more than the amount spent on technology, facilities and transportation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-26 | tran quynh | 11 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 78
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an ageing creates problems for government Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extend do the advantages of having an ageing populat 89
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1153.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12444444444 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74082081965 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573333333333 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.9844428309 43.030603864 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.111111111 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0659287108647 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0294469431912 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0193378456589 0.0843802449381 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0429546597627 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0148751245854 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.