Should arts-related entertainment venues such as museums and art galleries be free of charge for the general public, or should a charge apply for admittance? Discuss this issue, and give your opinion.
Art galleries and museums are significant to a country's culture and heritage. Therefore, some people think that governments should charge for visiting these places, while I would argue that there should not be any entry fees for the citizens.
Those who are in favour of admission charges might argue that these art-related venues possess excellent art-pieces such as paintings and statues which require high maintenance costs. Moreover, authorities need funds to pay salaries for the recruited staff. For instance, there is an admission fee of Rs. 150 to see The Taj Mahal, which is spent on its preservation. If the government stop taking charges to visit these venues, then they have to spend the taxpayers' money to maintain the artwork. This would be an injustice to the common people who expect their money to be spent on providing basic infrastructure.
On the other hand, I would say that making the visits to cultural museums and historical monuments free would give the chance to the destitute to acknowledge their heritages as they do not earn enough money to spend on these stuffs. Moreover, free trips should be organised by the educational institutions so that the children would get to know about their invaluable patrimony. For example, there is no fee to visit the Jehangir art gallery in Mumbai and thus the citizens can come and see this proud symbol of freedom; hence, such visits should be free for the general public.
In conclusion, although funds are required to maintain and preserve the fine artworks of museums and galleries, government should provide equal opportunity to every class to see and proud of their culture. Thus, I believe that there should be no admission charges to the public to visit these venues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-02 | jashan2407 | 84 | view |
- Some people say it is more important to plant trees in the open spaces in towns and cities than to build more housing To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Many people prefer to spend money and to not save it What are the reasons Is this a positive or negative development 73
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a 0Ahobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 61
- Some people say it is more important to plant trees in the open spaces in towns and cities than to build more housing To what extant do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people say it is more important to plant trees in the open spaces in towns and cities than to build more housing To what extant do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'taxpayers'' or 'taxpayer's'?
Suggestion: taxpayers'; taxpayer's
...ese venues, then they have to spend the taxpayers money to maintain the artwork. This wou...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 564, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...nce, such visits should be free for the general public. In conclusion, although funds are r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 1.00243902439 1397% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 5.60731707317 428% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 965.302439024 151% => OK
No of words: 289.0 196.424390244 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0553633218 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67109650299 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 106.607317073 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560553633218 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 283.868780488 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5731044023 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.75 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 5.23603664747 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354953846807 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125167133564 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839858577448 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225586031994 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566453630497 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.