Should young people follow older people’s example or it’s good for them to challenge older people’s opinions and thoughts. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It's very essential to challenge older people’s opinion and thoughts instead of following their theories life time. In my opinion, new challenges, research and technologies would always give better way to find something new that eventually brings new theories according to current era.
In todays fast pace world, it can be seen that world is moving rapidly towards the technology in order to do something finest in every inventions which ultimately provides comfort-ability to human beings. Nowadays, the world's mentality has become entirely different as compare old people. Most of the youngsters do not follow the old rules of Human Resource, they says, it was designed for old people not to current, as well as, one of the obvious difference between old and young people is technology that segregate the couple of them enough. Moreover, mostly youngster are working with full of advance technology which was not available for old people. Many intellectual people concern that there is no comparison between old and young people owing to clear difference in study and technology. But, many adepts assert that still number of theories is being followed of old people who could never be challenged for instance, gravity theory, Quantum theory and many others. Furthermore, old people did not have enough resources to find something better, in contrast, this is the time of technology wherein people are playing with technology as well as well acquire every single information from internet within a shorter time that's sadly was not available to old people.
On the other hand, owing to comfort in work the vast majority of people are still follow old theories in different areas. Whereas, it has number of adverse consequences to not following and own new technologies and theories for instance, in many industries advance calculated machineries are installed to minimum input and maximum output that eventually enhance the capacity of the product which supports the government as well. Apart from this, one of the most negative impacts of advance technology is to increases the unemployment ratio around the globe.
In conclusion, it's good to follow old people's theory and thought but not everything. Because, in order to do something better people need to work more and more, inclusive this government should look after their pitfalls as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-20 | Muhammad Waleed Khan | 73 | view |
- Creative artist should always be given the freedom to express their own idea (in words, pictures, music or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do.To what extant do you agree or disagree with this opini 67
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such thing as food and educations? Or it is the responsibility of the government of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 61
- People doing dangerous sports activities like scuba diving and bungie jumping, they should be responsible for their own life and rescue workers should not risk their lives to save people. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- “Many people try to look younger than their age. What are the causes people do this. Do you think this is a good thing or bad thing?” 84
- Governments prohibiting the underage children for getting full-time jobs in certain countries, do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...hts instead of following their theories life time. In my opinion, new challenges, researc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...-ability to human beings. Nowadays, the worlds mentality has become entirely different...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'say'
Suggestion: say
...w the old rules of Human Resource, they says, it was designed for old people not to ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1142, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'as well'.
Suggestion: as well
...rein people are playing with technology as well as well acquire every single information from i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1227, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ion from internet within a shorter time thats sadly was not available to old people. ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 508, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'increase'.
Suggestion: increase
...ive impacts of advance technology is to increases the unemployment ratio around the globe...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, still, well, whereas, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 5.60731707317 339% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 965.302439024 206% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 377.0 196.424390244 192% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26525198939 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 3.73543355544 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74677624541 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 106.607317073 192% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543766578249 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 283.868780488 216% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.428716314 43.030603864 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.785714286 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9285714286 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 5.23603664747 221% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234491974832 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892944715156 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867286079665 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148143090087 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543502491442 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 40.7170731707 233% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.