Smokers, percentage of population , 1950-1990
The bar graph provides information about the percentage of men and women that were smokers between 1950 and 1990.
Overall, it was clear that there were higher percentage of men that smokes compared to women from 1950 to 1990.
In 1950, majority of smokers where men at 80%, in which it was the highest percentage in the entire period, whereas women smokers were only below 20%. After a decade, male smokers were still leading just below four-fifths and female smokers had a slight increase to a fifth. In 1970, although the population of women that smoke doubled compared to 10 years ago, men were still higher at around seven in ten.
10 years later (1980), the population of male smokers decreased by one in ten, in contrast, female smokers reached its highest population at more than two-fifths. At the end of the period, both sexes declined its number of smokers, but apparently, men were still higher compared to women at almost 50% and above 30%, accordingly.
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Problem Today s schools should teach their students how to survive financially in the world today To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 86
- The two pie charts illustrates the proportion of male and females in employment that are divided into six different field of occupations and are equally divided to manual and non-manual category in Great Britain in the year 1992. 73
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today’s world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History.Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on about the percentage of men and women that were smokers between 1950 and 1990....
^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...highest percentage in the entire period, whereas women smokers were only below 20...
^^
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t increase to a fifth. In 1970, although the population of women that smoke doubl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, but, if, still, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89156626506 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43101959939 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542168674699 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.6427335636 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219286408787 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112981119791 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085988577638 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167331418913 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714200966583 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.