In some nations, there has been an increase in the number of residents who are keen on exploring the foundation of the apartment or house in which they are residing in. Several reasons can explain this trend and there are many ways that can be taken to meet the needs of people.
This phenomenon happens due to loads of reasons, one of which are security issues. Before investing money in a house or building, citizens tend to find out about the history of that, which is a rewarding way for them to avoid being in risk of crime rate. A telling example is that apartments in the urban area are now equiped with surveillance, which is followed by the degradation of robbers and so on. In addition, nobody looks forward to being taken in by the agents that are not guarantee. The second cause of this is enhancing knowledge. Individuals living in their house want to tell their children or foreigners about the origin of their places of living with full of pride.
There are lots of workable methods that people can take to better their understanding of places where they are residing in. The main way is to sign in the local websites, which allocate people with an enormous amount of valuable informations and data. By doing this, individuals will be kept updated with the news and changes that take place in the area. Another measure is asking the senior citizens and people living in the proximity of the area. This is sometimes superior to the solution mentioned above in case the local website have not updated the news yet.
Inconclusion, there are a lot of causes that lead to people's exploration of their living destinations and several methods can be taken to please their needs.
- The tables give information about the temperatures and hours of daylight in London and Sydney during the same weekend in December 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people believe that the aging population is good for business the economy and society Other howeve disagree with this view Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The tables give information about the temperatures and hours of daylight in London and Sydney during the same weekend in December 2018 92
- Gender equality has not been achieved in our society Women still do not have the same rights and opportunities as men To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
- IN SOME COUNTRIES MORE AND MORE PEOPLE ARE BECOMING INTERESTED IN FINDING OUT ABOUT THE HISTORY OF THE HOUSE OR BUILDING THEY LINE IN WHAT ARE THE REASONS FOR THIS HOW CAN PEOPLE RESEARCH THIS 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In some nations, there has been an incre...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be taken to meet the needs of people. This phenomenon happens due to loads of ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... places of living with full of pride. There are lots of workable methods that ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ebsite have not updated the news yet. Inconclusion, there are a lot of causes ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 59, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
... there are a lot of causes that lead to peoples exploration of their living destination...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, second, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 7.0 314% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 3.15609756098 444% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 5.60731707317 375% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 297.0 196.424390244 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69023569024 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51571712615 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 106.607317073 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531986531987 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 283.868780488 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0386934688 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.07142857143 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203948944793 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663827682685 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395495023168 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118610056664 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030006291115 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.