Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Several experts claim that studying a new language apart from the mother tongue at elementary school instead of secondary school is more beneficial for students. This essay would agree that the benefits of the trend are more significant than the drawbacks.
One disadvantage of this trend is that primary school teachers might not have sufficient language ability to instruct the students. To be more specific, it requires fewer credentials and less academic knowledge for them to be qualified as an educator compared to teachers of higher levels, so they may not possess the necessary skills to deliver the assigned lessons properly. Another negative aspect is that young children could be at risk of not being capable of balancing the use of their first and second language. For example, some kids experience problems forming a complete sentence in either their mother tongue or the newly learned language as they face trouble mixing up the vocabulary. Hence, this could cause them confusion when communicating with those speaking one language only.
However, the drawbacks above pale in comparison with the advantages. Firstly, elementary students are more receptive to learning another language. To explain, taking up a linguistic skill at an early stage of life allows children to gain knowledge more effectively because they tend to reflex on a new language more instinctively and quickly than adults. Another positive aspect is that primary students have more time to learn and use a language than secondary students. Specifically, elementary students tend to endure a workload that is less heavy than their counterparts, which spares them time to study via entertainment channels, allowing them to absorb the language without the need to put in much effort. Thus, they would be of a better advantage when it comes to picking up a new language thanks to the extra time that they have.
In conclusion, the merits of this trend certainly surpass the demerits. By starting their linguistic learning sooner, not only can the students acquire knowledge more quickly, but they will also have more time to get familiar with the new language naturally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-25 | lydia231232 | 67 | view |
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 67
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 84
- Task 1 The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 73
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to study 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, so, thus, apart from, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 5.60731707317 499% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 965.302439024 188% => OK
No of words: 346.0 196.424390244 176% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25144508671 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73153192631 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 106.607317073 177% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546242774566 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 283.868780488 200% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5702709518 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.133333333 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219538853404 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733260106588 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685344326025 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137119901712 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650781511761 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 40.7170731707 223% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, so, thus, apart from, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 5.60731707317 499% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 965.302439024 188% => OK
No of words: 346.0 196.424390244 176% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25144508671 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73153192631 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 106.607317073 177% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546242774566 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 283.868780488 200% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5702709518 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.133333333 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219538853404 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733260106588 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685344326025 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137119901712 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650781511761 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 40.7170731707 223% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.