Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
About the key feature of an employee, the society is polarized into two groups. Many of today’s companies believe that smart clothing stands a significant role for their staff. However, others may find that working performance is more important. In this essay, I will discuss both views and give my own opinion.
On one hand, organisations believe that smart clothing would build up their professional image. Given that, a smart outfit can give customers good first impression of the firm that lead them to think the firm is well organised. In this way, customers will have more confidence about the organisation and willing to choose their service which will drive income of the corporation. We can refer to a survey conducted by the Hong Kong University which indicates that many people find image of a company only by their staff's outlook.
On the other hand, other firms find that high quality of work is the key to make their customer to stay. Other than image of a company, people value what quality of the product or service they can get when they are considering of purchasing again with the same organisation. For example, my friend always eats in the same canteen only because it have the best fried chicken in town although the staff there do not have smart uniform. Therefore, one of the key features for keeping the client is to give a good work.
From my point of view, working quality is essential for a company in long term because it will increase their customer's loyalty of the company. In contrast, smart outlook of employees can only give people an impressive first impression which only stands for a short period of time and maybe not sustainable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-31 | Jason021112 | 56 | view |
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why is it Is it a positive or negative development 73
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why is it Is it a postivive or negative development 73
- Human activities have posed negative effects on plants and animals Some people think it is too late to do anything while other people think that we should take effective action to improve the situation Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why is it Is it a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...ats in the same canteen only because it have the best fried chicken in town although...
^^^^
Line 4, column 266, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...mpression which only stands for a short period of time and maybe not sustainable.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, for example, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 5.60731707317 446% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 288.0 196.424390244 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82638888889 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54098351475 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 106.607317073 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 283.868780488 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.246885862 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2857142857 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247238577785 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880793535324 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655944465624 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15621770126 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458751894477 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.