People have different views regarding how higher education institutes should offer its seats to deserved candidates. Although a section of society asserts that most universities must admit only those students who do well in academics, I harbour the belief that it ought to select candidates based on multiple criteria and only on the basis of educational scores. This essay will discuss both viewpoints involving my recommendations in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, there are numerous reasons why a few people bolster that educational bodies must give preference to only bright students. One of the primary reasons is that universities always hunt for top-class students and challenge that toppers may bring laurels to their universities by getting placed in reputed companies. Since such intelligent students always aspire to achieve more marks than their peer group, it will indulge motivation among the mates which will assist them in getting a good position in public and private sector jobs. Therefore, it will aid universities to add a feather in their cap by rising the glory of its educational system or fame to its institutes.
On the contrary, I opine that instead of focusing only on grabbing top-class students in academics, it is equally important to opt for other talented students who excel in at least one field. Therefore, in order to maintain equilibrium among batch mates, it is required to have some talent other than studies, and it may be in the form of sports or dance talent. Consequently, other candidates may learn some life-long qualities such as teamwork spirit, collaboration, and leadership skills. These skills will not only allow folks to focus on interpersonal aspects but also help them to become better entrepreneurs which in turn benefit study institutions to make their prospects stronger than ever before.
In conclusion, while a good amount of people still put their viewpoint in the favor of providing seats in colleges based on higher grades, I firmly emphasize universities to pay attention to other talents as well so that there would be a mixed talent to showcase their skills in the same universities.
- Some people say that all mobile cell phone conversations should be banned in public and crowded places Others disagree Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 73
- Recent advances in air travel have focused only on those sitting in upper class and have left other passengers with no benefits To what extent do you agree or disagree 76
- violence at these events is on the increase. Why is this so? What should authorities do to prevent violence from taking place at sports events? 60
- Smart devices have put all of the world s information at our fingertips What are the drawbacks of this development 89
- Write a letter complaining about the dirty roads and garbage in your street Why it is effect and problem What is the main causes Your suggestions 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, regarding, so, still, therefore, well, while, at least, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 1.00243902439 1297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 5.60731707317 553% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1816.0 965.302439024 188% => OK
No of words: 348.0 196.424390244 177% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2183908046 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 3.73543355544 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.900016173 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 106.607317073 197% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603448275862 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 283.868780488 200% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 1.53170731707 588% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.9873280261 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.333333333 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210802188507 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069690363307 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367023800065 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120060001317 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353811994416 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 40.7170731707 241% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.