Some people believe that violence in the media, such as in television programs and films, directly results in violent behaviour. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Media have become an essential element of entertainment and information in everyone's life. Many scholars and policy makers have been doing a constant debate over the behavioral impact of films and television programs. There are many arguments and evidences supporting and opposing the negative impact of these contents. In this essay we will try and analyses how this cannot be the main reason of violent behavior in people.
Crime and violence were always present since the beginning, but invention of Television happened less than half a century ago. Majority of well-directed graphic content always convey some valuable message to audience which shows the positive sides in all situations and undesirable ending of violent actions. Actors playing positive roles has been glamorized as Heroes. Positive roles are mostly played by big celebrities, who are role models for many people. Seeing them doing good has always motivated people to do good, choose peace over violence and maintain harmony.
To oppose all the positive impact policy makers has some contradictory view to this discussion, which indicate the negative behavioral impact of these media content like movies and shows. In some films when director glamorize the violent incident. Audience loves fight & action scenes and unconsciously admire the dominating side, this leaves a strong impression of bad behavior on people. If some popular celebrities start doing negative roles this can impact its follower in many ways. These followers can try to replicate their actions. Like Sanjay Dutt doing movies like Vastav.
Media show all kind of content but in majority of them they always end it on a positive and happy not, in favor of non-violent behavior. It totally depends on the viewer that what kind of content they prefer and what part of the content they get influenced by the most.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-25 | deepakmalik | 84 | view |
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Some people believe that violence in the media such as in television programs and films directly results in violent behaviour To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 343, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...f these contents. In this essay we will try and analyses how this cannot be the main re...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...s are mostly played by big celebrities, who are role models for many people. Seeing the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 391, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...g impression of bad behavior on people. If some popular celebrities start doing ne...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 5.60731707317 339% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 965.302439024 162% => OK
No of words: 297.0 196.424390244 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27272727273 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60426899864 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 106.607317073 162% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582491582492 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 283.868780488 176% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4798211082 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1176470588 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4705882353 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.52941176471 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163916097091 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503963682787 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04409765322 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937729400204 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187860110557 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 40.7170731707 214% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.