Some people say that parents should places restrictions on the hours their children spend watching TV and playing computer games, and encourage them to spend this time reading books instead. Do you agree or disagree?
It is commonly said that parents should put limitations on playing computer games and watching television for their children, engaging them to read more books. In this essay I agree with that notion and in my opinion, books are more beneficial for children than the electronic devices.
On the one hand, computers and television are essential components of any modern individual regardless of the age. TV programmes may contain irreplacable contents of information as part of self education. For example, a program teaching a child Italian language can be incredibly valuable for a family that moved from the USA to Italy with a child who needs basic knowledge in Italian. As for computers, these pieces of technology are undoubtedly incredible tools to gain necessary information from Internet. However, both devices can have negative effects on child, such as affecting on shortsighedness or becoming an addiction for him.
Meanwhile, books can lead to many positive changes in the child’s development. Firstly, reading develops imganation. Children subconciously transform the textual information into imaginary reality, creating their own world full of facts and personalities. As a matter of fact, language knolegde is also enriched through reading. Because books contain mainly literary texts, the grammatical skills and vocabulary are developed in a child’s brain. What is more, the positive literary heroes become role models for children, improving their moral and ethical values.
To sum up, it can be reiterated that although computer games and television can be useful tools for children, du to their negative effects on child’s development in case of overusage, they should be limited and replaced by reading.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-27 | hakobyan04.07 | 95 | view |
- Do you agree or diagree with the following statemnt? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from travelling to foreign countries. Use specific reasons and examples. 80
- Integreted 3
- Agree / disagree 3
- Nowdays, more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face. Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- some people prefer to take courses over the internet. what are advantages of such courses? 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, may, so, while, as for, for example, such as, as a matter of fact, in my opinion, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 965.302439024 153% => OK
No of words: 267.0 196.424390244 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52808988764 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05060260743 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 106.607317073 161% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644194756554 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 283.868780488 164% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6314796887 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.428571429 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13647336691 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479792859632 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596054834151 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984662723793 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816643310029 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 40.7170731707 221% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.