Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones. Which types of old buildings should be preserved? Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages?
It is observed that old buildings should be more preserved than the other one. In my view, some old buildings such as: museum, art or historical buildings should be re-build and preserved. This deed has more merits than drawbacks.
Firstly, types of old buildings have a significant educational role to support students or foreign tourists with more knowledge and information about history. Almost all these buildings take place in the center area and show their beauty with the beauty of ancient and unique architecture. Some old buildings can still operate commercially and serve all residents and visitors like Ho Chi Minh Theater or Duc Ba Church. However, with plenty of bad conditions affecting old buildings and impacting deterioration, the government should make a plan to recover these old buildings to make them artistically and valuable again.
Secondly, preserving these buildings bring about more upsides than downsides. Although the costs of rebuilding them can be costly, the spiritual and tourism values of them are far more significant. In Ho Chi Minh City, Independence Palace or Duc Ba Church are prominent tourist attractions which attract travelers to pay them a visit. In addition, those spots are also places for school’s field trips in history class, which show patriotism and national pride to students. To me, preserving these destinations is worth any costs that may occur.
In conclusion, old buildings with historical values are worth preserving, and this practice is absolutely advantageous to me.
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39419087137 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9178062111 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 106.607317073 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609958506224 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3877654449 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.460043158303 0.215688989381 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170255889083 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145331246331 0.0843802449381 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282349260094 0.15604864568 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124676093463 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.