source of electricity generated
The provided line graph compares the source of electricity generated in France by four various kinds, namely Thermal, Nuclear, Hydroelectric and renewable from 1980 to 2012
It is clear that the amount of both Nuclear and renewable increased over the research period. By contrast, the electricity source produced by thermal and hydroelectric fell gradually during the period.
In 1980, around 50 TWh source of electricity generated by nuclear in France in comparison with the negligible amount of renewable. As can be seen from the chart that, over the next 32 years, the electricity source by nuclear was by far the most popular source of electricity with over 450 Twh before decreasing slightly to 430 TWh. Meanwhile, although the figure for renewable roughly kept stable, but then rose slowly to nearly 25 TWh until 2005.
The figure of Therm was the largest overall source production with over 100 TWh in the year 1980, whereas that of hydroelectricity generated only around 70 TWh. The amount of produced both Therm and Hydroelectricity witnessed a small fluctuation before remaining steady around 50 TWh at the end of the year.
- energy consumption 22
- tourist 11
- average yearly the US expenditure on the cell phone, national fixed-line and international fixed- line from 2001 to 2010 67
- visitors 30
- household car ownershipthe number of car is expected to increase quicklyIt is expected that the number of car will riseexpectation show thatpredictionexpected -- expectation, predicted---prediction 22
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'source' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sources'.
Suggestion: sources
...ing the period. In 1980, around 50 TWh source of electricity generated by nuclear in ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14594594595 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90071399991 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556756756757 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.1259782555 43.030603864 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 190.4 112.824112599 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.0 22.9334400587 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339807314236 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.221579566346 0.103423049105 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793021424801 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219800817095 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0925405560109 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.3 13.2329268293 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 10.3012195122 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.