The stipulated Pie Charts elucidate information about the number of aspirants who were captivated for an interview and got selected according to their respective field.
The stipulated Pie Charts elucidate information about the number of aspirants who were captivated for an interview and got selected according to their respective field.
Overall,the key points to note all that candidates from science stream dominated other participants. Interestingly, Science students were chosen maximum for jobs as well as fraction to appear in the interview was on its acme from their side.
Apropos to the detail of the given chart, that less than third of ratio was occupied by people having science. Consequently, qualifying factor also imitated similar criteria and more than three in ten interviewees were chosen by interviewers from this field. Apart from this, candidates from management and other streams collectively covered quarter of the total fraction while selection criteria was little higher one fifth and 14% for them respectively.
Moving to the further details of the chart, that agriculture students and engineers as well as Commerce students appeared by the difference of two percent each that is 14% 16% and 18% respectively whereas few aspirants from these streams Petty fraction only 7% from cultivated Field one in ten engineers and 16% those who had commerce, selected for the jobs. Surprisingly, only 7390 people were chosen for jobs from 25,780 candidates.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | Aanchal sharma | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... to their respective field. Overall,the key points to note all that candidates ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce students were chosen maximum for jobs as well as fraction to appear in the int...
^^
Line 9, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... imitated similar criteria and more than three in ten interviewees were chosen by...
^^
Line 9, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eams collectively covered quarter of the total fraction while selection criteria ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, so, third, well, whereas, while, apart from, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47058823529 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8783986481 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.4855100912 43.030603864 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.5 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361784692062 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18519993541 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.310578551831 0.0843802449381 368% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328601503578 0.15604864568 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.388291737502 0.0819641961636 474% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.