the table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999

The stipulated tabular chart elucidates information about the percentile of the deprivated families of Australia which were distributed in distinct categories in year 1999.

Overall, the key points to note all that, couples with children and single parents highly suffered with poverty however aged couples were found much satisfied among all.

Apropos to the detail of the given chart, that 54000 aged people who used to live solely were witnessed in this phenomenon. Conversely, the ratio of old couples was low nearly 4% which includes 48000 Australian citizens. Apart from this, a whooping proportion approximately 19% containing Singles and were without children placed second rank.

Moving to the further details of the chart, that 933000 that is 12% of people with children noticed, living a miserable life in 1999. However, this ratio was nearer to half of that couples who did not had any child. Despite this, sole parents were the major victim of deprivation involved 21% of provided ratio. Interestingly, 11% of the total population of Australia nearly 1837,000 lived a deprivated life in 1999.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an citizens. Apart from this, a whooping proportion approximately 19% containing ...
^^
Line 7, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is 12% of people with children noticed, living a miserable life in 1999. However...
^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nts were the major victim of deprivation involved 21% of provided ratio. Interes...
^^
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he major victim of deprivation involved 21% of provided ratio. Interestingly, 11...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, second, so, apart from

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33522727273 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67824661057 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653409090909 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1109061084 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.333333333 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145161949284 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058349381975 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620866777347 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896208979667 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568072383819 0.0819641961636 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.