Summarize the changes in the layout of the Woodward University in not less than 150 words

Essay topics:

Summarize the changes in the layout of the Woodward University in not less than 150 words.

The two maps show information about the drastic development of the Woodwards University campus layout between 1985 and the present.

As a result of construction work, it can be easily pointed out that the carparks have been demolished to make room for a terminal for shuttle buses, as well as a theatre for lecturing university members. Moreover, the various scientific units at the north of the campus have been merged into an enormous block consisted of science laboratories. In terms of subtle changes, the library to the northwest of the campus has featured an IT center to serve technological demands, which leads to the fact that the total size of the entire unit is considerably extended. However, the administration unit to the southeast of the university has received a rather opposite alternation, where the area occupied by the admin building has been shortened prior to the completion of the layout changes. Finally, the large road system for navigation has been simplified to a handful of narrow pathways mainly for walking.

Overall, the Woodward University witnessed a major reconstruction between 1985 and the current time period, promoting a more environmentally-friendly and organized way of navigation.

Votes
Average: 5.2 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-08-12 Hilla2020 89 view
2020-08-11 Hilla2020 73 view
2020-08-05 Cuberates 52 view
2020-08-05 Cuberates 91 view
2020-06-28 sanjay marwaha 77 view
Essays by user Cuberates :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...he northwest of the campus has featured an IT center to serve technological demands, ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'centers'?
Suggestion: centers
...thwest of the campus has featured an IT center to serve technological demands, which l...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, moreover, so, well, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32989690722 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28369531243 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628865979381 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.3651698718 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.714285714 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10796495364 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509601388701 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555029458511 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960675864853 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460375023178 0.0819641961636 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.06136585366 129% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.