The table above demonstrates the proportion of the 7 problems faced by primary students from school A and B in 2005 and 2015.
It is clear that school A faced more problems than school B in 2005, but a lot less than the proportion of 2015. However, school B problem data remained relatively the same over the period.
In 2005, the major problem that school A had to face was Following instructions, accounting for 42%, which, in contrast, narrowed down to just 6% in school B. A similar trend was seen in other aspects, but to a lesser extent, with reading, handwriting, and spelling accounted for 23, 28, 30% respectively in school A, and 8, 7 and 5% individually in school B. As for listening skills and verbal expression of ideas problem, the proportion of school A was almost that of school B tripled.
Over the next ten years, the problems about reading ability and handwriting remained the same as 2005 for both school A and school B. However, Concentration in lessons and Following instructions dropped rather considerably by around 22%, followed by Listening skills and verbal expression of ideas reduced by 15%.
The table above demonstrates the proportion of the 7 problems faced by primary students from school A and B in 2005 and 2015.
It is clear that school A faced more problems than school B in 2005, but a lot less than the proportion of 2015. However, school B problem data remained relatively the same over the period.
In 2005, the major problem that school A had to face was Following instructions, accounting for 42%, which, in contrast, narrowed down to just 6% in school B. A similar trend was seen in other aspects, but to a lesser extent, with reading, handwriting, and spelling accounted for 23, 28, 30% respectively in school A, and 8, 7 and 5% individually in school B. As for listening skills and verbal expression of ideas problem, the proportion of school A was almost that of school B tripled.
Over the next ten years, the problems about reading ability and handwriting remained the same as 2005 for both school A and school B. However, Concentration in lessons and Following instructions dropped rather considerably by around 22%, followed by Listening skills and verbal expression of ideas reduced by 15%.
- The pie charts above depict the median ages of Yemeni and Italian citizens in 2000 and predictions in 2050.It is well-defined from the charts that kids, teenagers and adults under 60 years old account for most of Yemen’s population both in 2000 and 2050 73
- The first line graph shows the average monthly spending on children s sports by their parents from 2008 to 2014 while the second one presents the amount of children participating in football athletics and swimming in the UK at the same time It is clear fr 82
- The bar chart shows information about people’s drinking behavior by age group in the US. Severaltrends areevident.The highest proportion of those who never drink (nearly two-thirds) was in the 16 to 24 yearsgroup. The proportion tended to decrease with 56
- The first line graph shows the average monthly spending on children’s sports by their parents from 2008 to 2014 while the second one presents the amount of children participating in football, athletics and swimming in the UK at the same time.It is clear 78
- The line graph above demonstrates the quantity of waste released by three businesses A, B and C over fifteen years from 2000 to 2015.It’s easy to see that the three above bear little to no resemblance in the fluctuation of waste produced in tonnes.In th 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85492227979 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88977995878 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533678756477 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6665719696 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.125 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.634359488813 0.215688989381 294% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.338124438215 0.103423049105 327% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.265794780268 0.0843802449381 315% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.484586620631 0.15604864568 311% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.238625231641 0.0819641961636 291% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.