The line chart above compares the number of old peoples who were 65 and over 65 years old from 1940 to 2040 in Japan, Sweden, and America.
It is clear from the chart that the three countries all had and will have more and more 65-and-over-year-old people. But only Japan’s old people tended to decrease in the early 100-year period and will jump rapidly at the end.
By 1940, Japan, Sweden, and the United States had a percentage of 5%, 7% and 9% of people aged 65 and over respectively. Over 20 years later, Sweden and the USA had the same pattern, rising up and reached 10% and 9% one by one while Japan figure fell to 3%. Whereas Japan kept moving unchangeable, USA climbed up with the same speed of Sweden to 15% and 14% in turn after 1980.
After that, America slightly went down, Sweden was up and Japan increased significantly. Experts predict that almost in 2040, all three countries will reach the highest points, particularly Japan will account for 27%, Sweden with 25% and the USA with 23% of people who will be 65 and over 65 years old.
The line chart above compares the number of old peoples who were 65 and over 65 years old from 1940 to 2040 in Japan, Sweden, and America.
It is clear from the chart that the three countries all had and will have more and more 65-and-over-year-old people. But only Japan’s old people tended to decrease in the early 100-year period and will jump rapidly at the end.
By 1940, Japan, Sweden, and the United States had a percentage of 5%, 7% and 9% of people aged 65 and over respectively. Over 20 years later, Sweden and the USA had the same pattern, rising up and reached 10% and 9% one by one while Japan figure fell to 3%. Whereas Japan kept moving unchangeable, USA climbed up with the same speed of Sweden to 15% and 14% in turn after 1980.
After that, America slightly went down, Sweden was up and Japan increased significantly. Experts predict that almost in 2040, all three countries will reach the highest points, particularly Japan will account for 27%, Sweden with 25% and the USA with 23% of people who will be 65 and over 65 years old.
- The line chart above compares waste products in tonnes among 3 companies A, B and C from 2000 to 2005.It can be seen from the graph that company A and B tended to produce less waste than they used to by the beginning. On the other hand, company C’s rate 67
- The pie graphs above show the different amount of water used for residential needs, industrial and agricultural purposes in San Diego, California and the World. It is clear that the water usage in the three places is generally different. In San Diego and 67
- The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011 73
- The line chart above compares the amount of old peoples who were 65 and over 65 years old from 1940 to 2040 in Japan, Sweden and America.It is clear from the chart that three countries all had and will have more and more 65-and-over-year-old people. But o 78
- The pie charts above demonstrate the responses to a questionnaire asking 100 Customers to the Parkway hotel on how they favored its service.It is clear that within only 5 years from 2005 the hotel had showed shown greater results with more and more Visito 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The line chart above compares the number of old people...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54166666667 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52066115114 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578125 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3220046035 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.657618810865 0.215688989381 305% => The coherence between essay topic and essay body is overfitting.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.3055067586 0.103423049105 295% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.271803211769 0.0843802449381 322% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.463081609188 0.15604864568 297% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.225850396047 0.0819641961636 276% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.