The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe

Essay topics:

The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts compare the amount of money from different resources used for the police and how the money was spent in a particular place in Britain over the years 2017 and 2018.
It is clear that financial support from all resources rose slightly between 2017 and 2018, and the national government accounted for the largest proportion of the police budget. We can also see that the money distributed for technology increased considerably in the same period.
In 2017, the police budget from the national government increased from £175.5 million to £177.8 million, while the money from other sources saw a slight increase from £38 million to £38.5 million. Although the national government received by far the highest proportion of the police budget, local taxes saw the biggest increase (£11.1 million) in the amount of money supported.
Looking more closely at the pie chart, we can see that 75% of the total budget spent on paying salaries in 2017 fell by 6% in 2018. There was no change in the proportion of buildings and transport in both years, at 17%, leading to a significant rise in the money spent on technology.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-29 minhnhat2002 84 view
2024-03-29 minhnhat2002 78 view
2024-03-09 minhnhat2002 73 view
2023-12-12 Ahmad_off 78 view
2023-12-12 Ahmad_off 78 view
Essays by user Daniel3003 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n Britain over the years 2017 and 2018. It is clear that financial support from ...
^^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llion in the amount of money supported. Looking more closely at the pie chart, w...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93684210526 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5512421612 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547368421053 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.529707404 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22925312269 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112163149127 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06820593421 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155224478479 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662895760922 0.0819641961636 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.