The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe

Essay topics:

The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparisons where relevant.

The table gives some information about police budget in three distinct groups, while the pie chart illustrates the percentage of distribution in three main different subjects for 2017 and 2018 in one area of the Unted Kingdom.
It is obvious that, the National Government has maximum budget among of these groups by 177.8m in 2018, by 69 percent of whole budget uses for officers and staff salaries.
As can be seen, the total budget about 14 percent has raised in 2018 and most increase related to the Local Texas by approximately 11 percent in one of areas of the United Kingdom. Other two groups did not increase significantly. The government decided to decrease 4 percent of the salary of staff and officers in 2018 and allocate this budget on technology group. The percent of money spent in buildings and transport don’t change in these two years.
As a result, by increasing the budget in 2018 and reduce staff’s salary the government have decided to pay attention on develop the technology by spent more money on it.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-29 minhnhat2002 84 view
2024-03-29 minhnhat2002 78 view
2024-03-09 minhnhat2002 73 view
2023-12-12 Ahmad_off 78 view
2023-12-12 Ahmad_off 78 view
Essays by user Ahmad_off :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 453, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsport don’t change in these two years. As a result, by increasing the budget in...
^^^
Line 4, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e technology by spent more money on it.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86931818182 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64525709002 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9536980595 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.428571429 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20961269509 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872310213256 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101008880768 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134056058743 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111622646071 0.0819641961636 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.