The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare the percentage of the annual costs in five main groups by a special school in the United Kingdom in 1981, 1991, and 2001.
It is obvious that, amount of all groups most of the costs related to teachers’ salaries that had ordered 40, 50, and 45 percent in the United Kingdom in 1981,1991 and, 2001.
As can be seen, one of the annual casts is insurance that increased slightly, and seems this item was no longer significant. Unfortunately, resources e.g., and books fell about 11 percent in 2001 after that increase 2001. The annual spending related to other workers’ salaries has a decreasing trend and dropped around 7 percent until 2001. Furniture and equipment are one of the most important items in every school which have to spend special cost that by 1991 this issue did not care. Finally, the teachers’ salaries include most of the annual cost of school more than 40 percent in 1981,1991 and 2001. Every year there are three main groups that have to spend more than 75 percent of annual cost to them.
In total, teachers’ salaries have the highest percentage and insurance that is very important did care.
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows he quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 67
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
e.g., finally, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80303030303 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44726546461 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535353535354 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.1052220151 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203438793701 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969100459149 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725241804238 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126863917889 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0994562488413 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.