The table below compares actual and predicted figures for populations in three different cites.
The table compares three different areas, namely Sao Paulo, Jakarta and Shanghai, in terms of the real population in 1990 and 2000 and projection inhabitants in 2000.
Looking at the report, it is immediately obvious that while the residents living in Shanghai decreased, the opposite was true for the other cities. Additionally, the actual citizen growth rate was much lower than expected in 2000.
In 1990, Sao Paulo municipality had the most people settling, at 15 million, followed by Shanghai and Jakarta, with 13.5 million and 9.5 million respectively. Although Sao Paulo's population was predicted to reach 24 million by 2000, it only rose to 18 million. Similarly, the number of residents in Jakarta just increased by 2 million to 11.5 million in 2000 compared to the estimate of 14 million.
Regarding the Shanghai city, there were 13.5 million people living in Shanghai in 1990 and the population was expected to experience a significant rise over the decade ensuing. However, in fact, it dropped to 12.5 million, instead of the forecast elevate to 17 million.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-02 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
- In many countries more and more young people are leaving school but unable to find jobs What problems do you think youth unemployment causes for individuals and the society What measures should be taken to reduce the level of unemployment among youngsters 61
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced 78
- The given bar graphs show the extent of cash that individuals in France, Germany and England spent on nourishment and different items in 1998 and 2008. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, regarding, similarly, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13142857143 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77679010105 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605714285714 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6858186037 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.25 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0971060697386 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047509628281 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455800417792 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0694333207243 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483320648179 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.