The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates information about workers and companies in two different provinces of Great Britain in a period of 50 years.
Overall, it can be seen that the number of men and women employees in England and Wales has decreased dramatically, while the factories witnessed a significant increase.
In 1851, the number of male workers was far more than women, which was 287,100 and 190,000 relatively. In contrast, at the end of the period, the number of men workers only 10,000 higher than that of females. In five different period of years given, only in 1861, the number of working women was higher than the figure for men.
In 1851, there were only 225 organisations. Following the next ten years, 2 more factories have been established. A significant growth in the number of companies can be seen in the next 20 years, at 721 plants. Then there was a decline in the number of companies to only 625 in 1891, before hitting the even number of 600 companies.
- People should look after their health for personal benefits, rather than a duty for a society. What extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. 56
- The chart below give information about attendance at entertainment venues and admission prices to those venues in 2009 79
- Some people believe that it is essential to include Physical Education classes in the curriculum for all school age children Others think that children s time is better spent on more academic subjects 47
- The pie charts below show the most common advantages and disadvantages of Bowen Island, according to a survey of visitors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 3, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tnessed a significant increase. In 1851, the number of male workers was far...
^^
Line 9, column 212, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ly 10,000 higher than that of females. In five different period of years given, o...
^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...as higher than the figure for men. In 1851, there were only 225 organisations...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70735853729 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9313031482 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2222222222 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132740898218 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571307302309 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364802857249 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879231223422 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039602515697 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.