The table below describes the number of employees and factroies in England and wales from 1851 and 1901

Essay topics:

The table below describes the number of employees and factroies in England and wales from 1851 and 1901.

The given data table illustrates how many workers and manufactories were there in both England and Wales over half a century.

Overall, it can be seen that the number of male employees was more than their female counterparts except for the year 1861. Also, the total number of staff decreased over the five decades. The number of factories tends to fluctuate every ten years.

Comparing data, the number of male workers had decreased over the years. Starting with 287,100 in 1851, then continued falling to 80,123 in 1871. This number then dropped dramatically to only 31,000 in 1901. Likewise, the number of women employees worked went down from 1851 to 1901. In 1851, there were 190,000 workers and started to decrease to 160,000 in 1861. After that, it experienced a gradual fall from 60,000 in 1871 to only 30,000 in 1901. Regarding factories, the number of them did not stabilize in these 50 years. In 1851, there were only 225 manufactories, however, this number started to raise to reach 721 in 1881. A slight fall happened in both 1891 and 1901 to end up at 600 factories.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-08-02 Dida18 78 view
Essays by user Dida18 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... falling to 80,123 in 1871. This number then dropped dramatically to only 31,000 in ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, likewise, regarding, so, then, except for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8128342246 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48752212197 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609625668449 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.8806130178 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.2307692308 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3846153846 22.9334400587 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27345512961 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914019433188 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699114318646 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153823621972 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451239137281 0.0819641961636 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.