The table below gives data on the hour of leisure time per year for people in some land.
The tabular chart depicts information about how people spend their free time in someland in different activities. There are mainly seven age factors are given.
Overall, the emerging fact from the chart is that, watching television and videos was the most popular among all age groups, whereas cinema was the less preferred activity.
Looking in more details at the watching Tv and videos were prominent among teenagers and 70 plus person, where teen spent 1200 hour per year and the figure for 70 above age was slightly lower, with 1100 hours. However, the time spent at the cinema and socializing with four or less individual is similar for all age groups. This ranges from 25 to 100 hours for the former category and 150 to 300 for the latter.
Marching forward, the number of hours spent on group exercises and socializing with 4 or more individuals is inversely proportional as the age advances, In the case of teens, the figures are 450 and 360 respectively, while in case of 70+ age the values are zero and 25. After that, the irregular fluctuations are noticed in case of both, individual exercise and socialization in small parts, with the figure for adults 250 to 300 as compared to teens and elders.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-05 | Manvir singh | 89 | view |
- The table below gives data on the hour of leisure time per year for people in some land 89
- Although some countries with long working hours are economically successful this often had some negative consequences To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The table and notes below give information about student enrolment at Brighton co ed secondary school in 1990 2000 and 2010
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide co2 emissions per person in the united kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
- The table and notes below give information about student enrolment at Brighton co ed secondary school in 1990 2000 and 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hour' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hours'.
Suggestion: hours
...d 70 plus person, where teen spent 1200 hour per year and the figure for 70 above ag...
^^^^
Line 4, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ter that, the irregular fluctuations are noticed in case of both, individual exer...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80861244019 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54140412353 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602870813397 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6539101217 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.625 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125547882919 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559612871855 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449740780846 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0673783238213 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061249693753 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.