Holding International games such as The Olympic Games is an exciting event. Some people think that it has positive effects while other argue that it is a waste of money. Dicuss both sides of view and give your own opinion.
Organising International sporting events such as The Olympic games is exhilarating activity. Although, some people believe that The Olympic Games is advantageous for the country, other opine that it is a wasteful activity. This essay will discuss both views and support the argument that such international games must be planned because of its positive impact, followed by a reasoned conclusion.
It is clear that by planing intercontinental games helps to attract several foreign tourists which result in a foreign currency inflow This is to say, when such multi-national games are organised by the host country invites many foreign tourists from all over the world which in turn brings in foreign currency that helps to boost the economy of the country. To elucidate, a recent poll done by the Indian Government found that a country's economy is benefiting the most by organising international sports events. As a result, it helps in the growth and development of the country.
However, certain people believe that the organisation of multi-national events leads to the wastage of financial resources of the country. In other words, a nation will have to spend huge sum of funds in the construction and development of infrastructures for these events. That is money allocated in constructing roads, hotels for foreign tourists, construction of the stadium and so on. To elucidate, a recent study conducted by the government found that more than millions of funds are wasted in organising international events. As a consequence, it puts the company under financial burden and distress.
To conclude, while some people believe that international events are beneficial, others opine that it is a waste of money. However, In my opinion, I vehemently agree that the organisation of multi-national events helps in the development and expansion of a country by bringing in more foreign funds.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-29 | Manvir singh | 73 | view |
- The table below gives information on consume spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
- The graph shows internet usage in three countries between 1999 and 2009
- The charts below show household spending pattern in two countries between 1980 and 2008 40
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide co2 emissions per person in the united kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
- The table shows data about the underground railway system in six major cities with date opened kilometer or route and passenger numbers per year in millions 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16147644833 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483333333333 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.5960449124 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.307692308 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239081944182 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931964483595 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953367125901 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166793441525 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111801878045 0.056905535591 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.