The table below gives information about the average annual distance travelled by adults and the types of travel in 1977 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares several means of transportation with regard to the amount of distance travelled by adults yearly in 1977 and 2007. There was a shift in the usage of the kinds of transportation.
There was a tendency to travel by faster types of transportation, as the figures for bus, bike, motorcycle and walking experienced a slight drop. Specifically, travellers in 2007 walked and rode motorcycles less than those in 1977 100 miles. Travellers by bike also declined to 80 miles in 2007. From the third prevalent mode, the average distance that passengers travelled by bus decreased by 300 miles during the period of 30 years.
Conversely, a private vehicle was recorded to have an increase in the average distance per year. Taking the lead was the figure for cars with a staggering rise from 3500 miles in 1977 to 7100 miles in 2007. Following that, the figure for trains was the second highest figure in 1977, increasing moderately by 100 miles in the same period. Additionally, taxi witnessed a tremendous increase in the annual average distance, with 800 miles in 2007, which is 600 miles longer than it was in 1977.
It can be seen that the average distance travelled per year changed variously depending on the specific kinds of transportation, but car was still the most popular mode throughout the period.
- the tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 78
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What sort of punishment should parents and t 61
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres travelled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050. 78
- The line graph shows the size of the global population from 1400 to 2000, and the pie charts show the global population by region in 1900 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, second, so, still, third, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94170403587 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86702484933 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578475336323 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7605490839 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.181818182 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 5.23603664747 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19816520436 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875439280924 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562396660894 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135560671225 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482474567476 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.