The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. Describe the information in the table and make comparisons where appropriate.
The table illustrates the average distance travelled per individual per year by different mediums of travel in England over a 15-year period. The units are measured in miles.
Overall, it is apparent that the use of the car, long distance bus, taxi, train and other vehicles rose over the period given, one the other hand, travelling distance by walking, bicycle, and local bus declined.
The use of some travel mediums increased over the given timeframe. In 1985, a person travelled 3,199 miles on average in England, which was higher than the other modes of travel. And it remained the highest in 2000 at 4,806 miles. A similar trend also observed for long-distance bus and train, which increased around three folds. Besides this, the use of the other mediums for travelling also raised from 450 to 585 miles.
In contrast, there was a decline in the use of some vehicles for journey observed. The people of England reduced their journey by walking, in 1985, it was 215 miles on average and dropped to 237 miles in 2000. Likewise, the tour by bicycle and local bus was decreased from 51 to 41 miles and 429 to 274 miles respectively.
- Some people say that mobile phone plays a major role in their professional life. Others say it plays more important role in their personal life. Discuss both sides. What is your opinion? 56
- The graph below shows the sales of children s books adult fiction and educational books between 2002 and 2006 in one country 81
- Today the majority of children are raised by their grandparents due to the fact that their parents are busy working To what extent do you think it affects the whole family 82
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 67
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, likewise, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81218274112 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46684840011 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548223350254 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.1932698758 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1818181818 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115844621929 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453834493067 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516733140599 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.071205972177 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411107391485 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.