The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
The table illustrates how long every British person traveled from 1985 to 2000 by different travel modes: Walking, Bicycle, Car, Local bus, Long distance bus, Train, Taxi, and Other. Overall, it is clear that the average distance in all modes presented an increase from 4740 miles in 1985 to 6475 miles in 2000.
Starting with car, long distance bus, train, taxi and other, there was a growth in the average distance during the fifteen years. In 1985, car, at 3199 miles, traveled far longer than any other mode. Then, its miles rose to 4806 miles in 2000, which still remained the longest distance. The same trend can also be seen in other (450—585 miles), train (289—366 miles) and long distance bus (54—124 miles). The miles that taxi traveled, always the shortest distance during, increased most slightly from 13 miles to 42 miles.
Turning now to the rest modes, however, the miles declined over the period of 15 years. The distance that local bus traveled experienced a decrease from 429 miles to 274 miles, which was the most dramatic decline.
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this. 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- Schooling is no longer necessary, since more and more information is accessible on the Internet, and students can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The graph below shows the demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer. The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home. 89
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8938547486 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16047323066 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620111731844 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0916605865 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110266131721 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544928346062 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611783085207 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895873069345 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686443025467 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.