The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
Describe the information in the table and make comparisons where appropriate.
The table illustrates the average travelled distance in miles per person in England between fifteen years from 1985 to 2000. Overall travelled distance has about fifty per cent increased from 4740 in 1985 to 6475 in 2000. Most of the covered travel miles per person by personal cars in both years.
In 1985 passengers travel by taxi only 13 miles by which ignorable however miles are jumped around three times in 2000 but still it second last in 2000. The least miles covered by bicycle in 2000 is 41 which came down from 51 in 1985. in cars, people cover 75 per cent of miles from total miles in both years. In local bus travelled miles has been fifty per cent decreased from 429 to 174. although, in 2000 long route bus miles per person has more than double in comparison of 1985. train miles also had a fifty per cent jump in 2000. walking saw a decrease in 2000 from 255 to 237, other modes of transportation increased miles per person.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-18 | Muhammad Hassam Saeed | 56 | view |
| 2020-03-04 | Shidbi | 61 | view |
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 73
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 56
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 133, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seconds'?
Suggestion: seconds
...around three times in 2000 but still it second last in 2000. The least miles covered b...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 236, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... is 41 which came down from 51 in 1985. in cars, people cover 75 per cent of miles...
^^
Line 2, column 391, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...fty per cent decreased from 429 to 174. although, in 2000 long route bus miles per perso...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 391, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...fty per cent decreased from 429 to 174. although, in 2000 long route bus miles per perso...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 485, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Train
...more than double in comparison of 1985. train miles also had a fifty per cent jump in...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 537, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Walking
...also had a fifty per cent jump in 2000. walking saw a decrease in 2000 from 255 to 237,...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 643, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsportation increased miles per person.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 774.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17382780184 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540697674419 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1735165188 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.4 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148963202195 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786109155452 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645000517259 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143830469455 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478129844359 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.52 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.