The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
The table illustrates the modifications in means of transportation in the UK in 1985 and 2000.
Overall, it is evident that all types of transport experienced an upward trend in 2000. Yet, the number of miles travelled by walking, bicycle, and local bus reached a record low in 2000, which was down from 15 years ago.
The average distance in miles travelled by car was significantly higher in 2000, at 4806 miles than any of the other modes of travel; whereas, the small quanity of miles travelled by person using a bicycle, at 41 miles in 2000. Each person walked nearly 255 miles in 1985, compared to a moderate fall in 2000, at approximately 240 miles. There was a twofold decrease in the number of local bus used in miles by roughly 200 miles.
The figure for miles used by taxi reached the lowest point, at 42 miles in 2000. This was up from an estimated threefold rise of 13 miles in 1985. Similarly, there was an increase in the number of miles used by bus, train, and other modes of travel in 2000, at 124 miles, 336 miles, and 585 miles respectively.
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years 78
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 73
- The diagrams illustrate the stages in the life of a silkworm and the process of producing silk cloth 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51295336788 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56943626859 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538860103627 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9724715299 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7777777778 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156338411202 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788298690995 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525495499843 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122536734743 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384308136836 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.