the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002

In this table we have five different countries in Europe is Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey. This table give us information about national consumer expenditure by category – 2002 year. We can see the most result in food(drinks) tobacco graph show Turkey has 32,14%, the less results show Sweden has 15,77%, in Uothiag and footwear we have quite interesting results the biggest result has Italy with 9,00% after Italy we have Turkey with 6,63%, after Turkey we have Spain with 6,51%, after Spain we have Ireland with 6,43%, and at the end we have Sweden with only 5%. The next graph give us information about wisure/Education. The most result – has Turkey 4,35%, after that Sweden 3,22%, after Sweden we have Italy 3,20%, after this country, we have Ireland with 2,21%, and the lost one is Spain with 1,98%. So in 2002 we have these results.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s table we have five different countries in Europe is Ireland, Italy, Spain, Swed...
^^
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... most result in fooddrinks tobacco graph show Turkey has 32,14%, the less result...
^^
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in fooddrinks tobacco graph show Turkey has 32,14%, the less results show Sweden...
^^
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun results is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...cco graph show Turkey has 32,14%, the less results show Sweden has 15,77%, in Uoth...
^^^^
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sults show Sweden has 15,77%, in Uothiag and footwear we have quite interesting r...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 705.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79591836735 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3092207229 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510204081633 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 201.6 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 117.002374145 43.030603864 272% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 117.5 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118415516641 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12233631416 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111606878958 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118415516641 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.