Better driver education for better driving habits is more effective than heavier punishments for driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There always will be demand for vehicles. For the time being, there is an increasing number of forms of transport on the roads that have raised major concern for road safety. Thus many people argue that the best method to ensure order on the roads is to imply strict punishments. Despite the need to regulate traffic, I consider that improving public driving skills would be a better assistance at minimising offenses.
Generally speaking, good driver education builds confidence in one's abilities. Many driving training work to reveal driver’s practice mistakes and correct them. For instance, many driving instructors tend to teach drivers how they should react to stressful situations like other bad drivers or poor weather conditions. As a result, they are prepared to face the risks and feel less stress on the roads. Therefore, well-trained drivers do not hinder the traffic.
Furthermore, driving education also includes knowledge of laws. There are many more factors that professional training teaches about and should be considered before taking the vehicle on the road like parking or rights of pedestrians. This way, driving training will help you understand all these regulations and factors to ensure everyone's safety. In other words, knowing your rights and responsibilities helps to avoid offenses.
In conclusion, it is obvious that it is necessary to uphold usual traffic flow, however, upgraded driving habits would make drivers more alert on the road. In this manner, I believe good-quality driving skills which prevent drivers from making mistakes and improve traffic are more efficient than heavy punishments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-24 | mary.ssherr | 67 | view |
- the chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The development of technology has caused environmental problems So some people think people should choose a simpler way of life while others think we should use technology to solve these problems Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors-agriculture, manufacturing, and business and financial services- to the UK economy in the twentieth century. Summary the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and comparison where 56
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do. 53
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...e raised major concern for road safety. Thus many people argue that the best method ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...d driver education builds confidence in ones abilities. Many driving training work t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 157, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ld make drivers more alert on the road. In this manner, I believe good-quality dri...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44705882353 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73451742434 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.647058823529 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3842653627 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262087619785 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078299121789 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481999311835 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144440038566 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285279450843 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.