People are living in a ‘throwaway society,’ using things for a short time and then throwing them away. What are the causes of this? What problems does it lead to?
Nowadays, more and more people use items for short period and after that they throw the things away. This essay will address the factors contributing to this phenomenon and propose viable solutions to deal with this matter.
Many people are unaware about the consequences of dumping a way their items as they never receive proper information about this issue. To deal with this problem, the govermental body should act quickly to increase people awareness about the negative effects of trowing away things. Placing bilboard containing message related to downside effects of consumerism, in various places, such as shoping centers or markets, for instance is an efective solution. This way, whenever people want to buy new things, they have to reconsider it, and eventually there will be no additional stuffs to be dumped.
Another possible variable is economic factor. Stuff, such as clothes are much more affordable in this era in comparison to decades ago. With limited amount of money, people are able to buy several set of new clothers, leading to consumerism life style. To solve this issue, the government have to impose high tax for consumer goods, such as clothes. Thus, the number of goods that can be purchased is limited and less things will end as waste.
Tu sum up, factors such as unaware about its negative consequences and decreasing economi value of consumer goods are two most important variables of the phenomenon. Therefore, to tackle this problem, approaches such as educating people and imposing higher tax are possible solutions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-31 | Wardiati Yusuf | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-31 | Wardiati Yusuf | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-31 | Wardiati Yusuf | 84 | view |
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- Fewer and fewer people today right by hand using a pen pencil or brush What are the reasons Is this a positive or a negative development 84
- Film stars and celebrities often share their views on public matters that have little to do with their profession Is this a positive or negative development 61
- The diagram details the process of making leather products Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun set seems to be countable; consider using: 'several sets'.
Suggestion: several sets
...amount of money, people are able to buy several set of new clothers, leading to consumerism...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun things is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ds that can be purchased is limited and less things will end as waste. Tu sum up, f...
^^^^
Line 4, column 4, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Tu) must be used with a third-person verb: 'sums'.
Suggestion: sums
... and less things will end as waste. Tu sum up, factors such as unaware about its n...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1746031746 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60057216024 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 106.607317073 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615079365079 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1851538774 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.307692308 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183983320292 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645280873078 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583487498098 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119177337654 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613798791097 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.