The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The supplied bar chart provides the comparison of the average cost of houses in five different cities between during the 1990 - 2002 period, which divided into two phases: 1990-1995 and 1996-2002, and in the year of 1989. At the general look, while the house prices in Tokyo still remained the same direction, the rest had the dramatic changes as opposite.
In the latter period, only the capital of Spain and the Frankfurt of Germany showed the positive increases in the household costs although they were just mere numbers of a few more than 0 percent. Whereas, that one of New York City plunged about five percent compared with 1989. Similarly, the percentage of Tokyo and London shared the point of 15% which illustrated for the most negative changes of five surveyed places.
Turning to the later time, it is apparent that the prices of houses witnessed the substantial grows apart from the one of Tokyo, Japan. According to the bar chart, comparing with the year of 1989, in 1996-2002, the London led the first rank in the statistics with the change of more than 10 percent, followed by New York, Madrid and Frankfurt with under 15% approximately. Finally, the household cost in Tokyo mildly climbed by nearly five percent, nevertheless, it was the last one which still in negative area.
To conclude, the visual clarifies how the average costs for houses in all aforementioned cities changes in the 1990s compared with 1989.
- The table below gives information on consumer expenditure on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevent. 78
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing. What factors contribute to job satisfaction? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive and negative development? 89
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working a for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e numbers of a few more than 0 percent. Whereas, that one of New York City plunged abou...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, nevertheless, similarly, so, still, whereas, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97520661157 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53983821675 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574380165289 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7042176962 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.777777778 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8888888889 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 5.23603664747 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308043437069 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12294044911 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854401246416 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199479887036 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721421830678 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.