The table below gives information about the percentage of land covered by forest in various countries in 1990 and 2005,with estimated figures for 2015.
This table provides information on land that was used to create forests in several states between 1990 and 2005, with estimated features for 2015.
In general, in Brazil, most land was allocated to forests, while in Chile, the lowest percentages of land were covered by forests.
Brazil holds the highest position. In 1990, the land allotted for forests was 62.2, however, until 2015, the indicators decreased and already amounted to 57.2. By 2015, indicators decreased again and reached 53.5 percent.
The figures for Australia and Chile show that in 1990, land percentages were 21.9 for Australia and 20.4 for Chile. Until 2005, interest rose to 21.3 for Australia and 21.5 for Chile. By 2015, in Australia this figure fell to 20.0, while for Chile, on the contrary, it rose to 22.0.
In 1990, in New Zealand, interest was 28.8, although until 2005 it was significantly increased and amounted to 31.0. By 2015, they increased by only 1.3 percent and amounted to 32.3.
To sum up, New Zealand and Chile constantly increased forest land while Brazil and Australia survived decreasing.
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of the salmon 69
- The use of mobile phones has increased dramatically in recent years. What are the positive and negative effects of this trend? 11
- Many of world's cities are currently facing a serious housing shortage. What are some of the reasons for this shortage and what solutions can you suggest? 61
- The bar graph gives information about the number of library books borrowed from Lammertown Public Library in 1991 and 2001 and the pie chart gives information about the library s membership in 2010 55
- A number of tertiary courses require students to undertake a period of unpaid work at an institutions or organisation as part of their programme. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this type of course requirement? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, in general, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13407821229 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50786347971 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530726256983 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 3.36585365854 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 110.310507946 43.030603864 256% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 131.285714286 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321540735699 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157830697312 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105695875183 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162914544888 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103196543823 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.