The bar graph below shows the amount of carbon emissions in different countries during three different years.
The bar chart demonstrates the quantity of gas emissions in six different countries in years 1975, 1990 and 2005.
The USA emitted the largest amount of carbon emissions for all three years. It increased from 120000 thousand metric tonnes in 1975 to 1600000 thousand metric tonnes by 2005. China's emissions doubled from approximately 300000 in 1975 to about 600000 in 1990, and it again doubled nearly to 1500000 by 2005. In contradiction from the USA and China, Germany's gas emissions decreased slightly from about 300000 in 1975 and 1990 to 200000 by 2005. Additionally, in United Kingdom carbon emissions declined too, from about 180000-160000 between 1975 and 1990 and growed to approximately 170000 in 2005. Canada's carbon emissions increased slightly during all three years to match UK. Gas emissions in India rose from approximately 80000 in 1975 to 380000 in 2005.
Overall, the USA and China were the biggest contributors of gas emissions during 1975, 1990 and 2005.
- Some people believe that it is a good idea to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. 61
- The use of mobile phones has increased dramatically in recent years. What are the positive and negative effects of this trend? 11
- The bar graph gives information about the number of library books borrowed from Lammertown Public Library in 1991 and 2001 and the pie chart gives information about the library s membership in 2010 55
- Many of world's cities are currently facing a serious housing shortage. What are some of the reasons for this shortage and what solutions can you suggest? 56
- The table below gives information about past and projected population figures in various countries for different years 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...1990 to 200000 by 2005. Additionally, in United Kingdom carbon emissions declined...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20253164557 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74867231355 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474683544304 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 207.0 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6040932523 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3333333333 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.777777777778 5.23603664747 15% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194699771282 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10293045688 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898422077073 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148471070533 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586659995334 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.