The given table chart depicts the information about the population of over 60-year-olds in various countries in 2000. The data has been celebrated in percentage.
Looking overall, it is clear that in North America data highest compare to others countries, on the contrary side in Africa merely by far the lowest figure.
To commence with, the ratio of population in Africa and North America was 5% and 11%, respectively in 2000. Similarly, the percentage of the population in Africa will 12%, meanwhile in North America will be 2% more. In addition, in Europe was population 22% in 2000, who will be 31% in 2050.
Furthermore, in 2000 the ratio of people in Asia and Oceania was analogue which is near about 12%. During the same year, the corresponding proportion of the public in Asia and all global was 7% and 13%. Nonetheless, the ratio of population in Latin America will 18%, as against 24% in the whole world. The varied significant difference in Asia and Oceania, the former will be 28% and the latter has 22% in 2050.
- The graphs below show the percentage of household energy used and the amount of greenhouse gases produced in Australia Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant 67
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 66
- the line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in china between 1982 and 2006 56
- some people think that newspaper are the best media to learn and get information from while others believe that the internet is a better source discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'data the highest'.
Suggestion: data the highest
...rall, it is clear that in North America data highest compare to others countries, on the con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heless, the ratio of population in Latin America will 18%, as against 24% in the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, nonetheless, similarly, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81460674157 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72897848476 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556179775281 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3356909552 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25689580622 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102253042992 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13093259496 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161594267937 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14368445568 0.0819641961636 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.