The given line graph depicts the information about oil output and utilizes in China from 1982 to 2006. The data has been calibrated in million per day.
Looking in overall, it is lucid the highest data onto oil utilised and in contrary the production by the lowest figure in given of period
Commencing with the number of the oil production and consumption in 1982 was near about 2 million, respectively. similarly, the number of production increase dramatically till to 1986. In addition, it shows no marked difference noticed between 1986 and 1990. However, after 1994 from receiving the number of generation remained contest collected at 3 million, till the end of period 2006.
Further, is clear the marginal difference was noticed from 1982 to 1990. There had been a dramatic rose observed in the number of oil consumption in China, it comprised to near about 4 million in 1994. While there is a marginal upsurge in the data of oil consumption between 1998 to 2006. moreover, it noticed that it a touch of peak point at the end of period compare to production.
- Fewer students are studying science at school and university favoring more computer based subjects instead Is this a positive or negative development What are the reasons for this 67
- Some people think that paying taxes is enough to contribute to the society other argue that being citizen involves more responsibilities Discuss what is your opinion 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 85
- The given line graph illustrates the proportion of the total music sold by three different ways between 2011 to 2010 overall it can be seen that the percentage of music sold through download and cds purchased decreased while by stream increased over the g
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...o 2006. The data has been calibrated in million per day. Looking in overall, it is l...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by the lowest figure in given of period Commencing with the number of the oil pr...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Similarly
...was near about 2 million, respectively. similarly, the number of production increase dram...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tween 1986 and 1990. However, after 1994 from receiving the number of generation ...
^^
Line 7, column 204, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...prised to near about 4 million in 1994. While there is a marginal upsurge in the data...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 292, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...f oil consumption between 1998 to 2006. moreover, it noticed that it a touch of peak poi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, similarly, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87431693989 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73442535589 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524590163934 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.0977313508 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339346981244 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120106751286 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107655182338 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193460301934 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652176623156 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.