The table provide information about the percentage of children who faced seven different educational problems in school A and school B over the period of ten years from 2005.
Overview, the proportion of pupils had faced a considerable number of issues in School A than that of school B both given years. Between 2005 and 2015, the percentage of children reported reading ability in School A almost similar, while school B was recorded 8% and 9% respectively. In terms of handwriting, both schools were registered at 28% and 7% within given periods.
When 30% of students had faced spelling problem from school A, the figure for school B was just 7% in 2005. By 2015, the data for school B was 15% less than that of school A. In case of listening skills and verbal expression of ideas, noticed exactly at 35% in school A, whereas school B had shown 11% and 14% respectively.
However, there was a one percent of difference had shown in school A and three percent difference in school B in 2015. The percentage of children had faced concentration in lessons declined significantly from 40% in 2005 in school A to 18% in 2015, but there was no change in both schools. Finally, following instructions showed a considerable decline from a massive 42% to moderate 18%. In contrast, the figures for school B in 2015 was twice as much as that of school A in 2005.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cational problems in school A and school B over the period of ten years from 2005...
^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iod of ten years from 2005. Overview, the proportion of pupils had faced a con...
^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ldren reported reading ability in School A almost similar, while school B was re...
^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing ability in School A almost similar, while school B was recorded 8% and 9% re...
^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% respectively. In terms of handwriting, both schools were registered at 28% and...
^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... In terms of handwriting, both schools were registered at 28% and 7% within giv...
^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...red at 28% and 7% within given periods. When 30% of students had faced spelling ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lem from school A, the figure for school B was just 7% in 2005. By 2015, the data...
^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ideas, noticed exactly at 35% in school A, whereas school B had shown 11% and 14...
^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l B had shown 11% and 14% respectively. However, there was a one percent of dif...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 11% and 14% respectively. However, there was a one percent of difference ha...
^^
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...significantly from 40% in 2005 in school A to 18% in 2015, but there was no chang...
^^
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was no change in both schools. Finally, following instructions showed a consider...
^^
Line 7, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...assive 42% to moderate 18%. In contrast, the figures for school B in 2015 was twi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69166666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81749248249 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504166666667 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1755313367 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.363636364 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 1.69756097561 825% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334806311161 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1507225532 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964943451342 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245993246766 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729426173922 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.